VIDEO
In this session
Join us for iSpring Days ANZ & APAC on June 9-10
Training is becoming part of operational infrastructure One thing became clear very quickly during the discussion: workplace learning is increasingly tied to operational performance.
Not because companies suddenly care more about training, but because business environments are moving faster than many organizations can realistically adapt to without continuous learning systems.
That showed up repeatedly in the panelists’ examples:
Mark described learning as a fundamental part of organizational change, especially for companies that already understand where they’re trying to go strategically.
Typically eLearning or any sort of learning really is an important part of any organizational change.
That point feels especially relevant now because many organizations are no longer operating in stable environments where training can be planned once or twice a year.
The pace of change itself is becoming part of the challenge.
Most learning problems are not really technology problems One of the more grounded parts of the conversation came from Wendy, whose background combines training and operations.
She repeatedly brought the discussion back to frontline employees.
Before designing training, organizations need to understand where people are struggling, what information is missing, and which problems are affecting day-to-day work.
And after rollout, measurement shouldn’t stop at analytics dashboards.
Wendy emphasized the importance of ongoing conversations and feedback loops:
Good old-fashioned talking to people, asking for feedback — that’s how we’re going to measure our progress.
That operational perspective stood out because it shifted the discussion away from “content delivery” and toward workplace performance.
The panel repeatedly returned to the same idea: training only matters if it changes something operationally.
Customer satisfaction. Compliance. Productivity. Confidence. Speed.
Otherwise, completion statistics alone don’t say very much.
Engagement is still one of the hardest parts of workplace learning The discussion around engagement was probably the most relatable part of the session.
Wendy described a familiar experience almost everyone has had at some point: buying an online course, feeling motivated initially, completing a few modules — and then quietly abandoning it halfway through.
Corporate learning faces the same problem.
Employees are already overloaded with meetings, screens, notifications, and operational tasks. Passive training content often becomes background noise very quickly.
David argued that poorly designed learning experiences are one reason employees sometimes dislike eLearning altogether.
If we create more learner engagement course design through microlearning, then it makes learners more happy and more engaged.
Interestingly, the panel didn’t frame engagement as a technology issue alone.
The conversation touched on:
interactivity, relevance, timing, practical application, and blended learning approaches that combine digital and human interaction. Mark made a particularly important observation here.
He pointed out that learning is no longer just “course content.” Real workplace learning also includes interaction with colleagues, hands-on application, assessment, and real-world practice.
That broader view feels much closer to how people actually learn at work.
AI is changing the speed problem more than anything else AI came up constantly throughout the discussion, but not in the exaggerated “AI will replace everything” sense that often dominates these conversations.
Instead, the panelists spoke about a much more immediate issue: speed.
David described one of the biggest challenges facing learning teams today as the shrinking lifecycle of knowledge itself.
New tools, workflows, and technologies evolve so quickly that training content can become outdated almost immediately after it’s created.
Even if we finish the course after three or four months, later new technology or new skills comes up.
That creates a difficult balancing act.
Organizations need faster content creation, but they also need quality, accuracy, and relevance.
Several speakers suggested that AI may become most valuable not as a replacement for instructional design, but as a way to reduce production bottlenecks: summarizing information, speeding up content creation, analyzing feedback, or helping personalize learning experiences.
David also raised another interesting point during the discussion: as AI systems become more capable, human critical thinking becomes even more important.
That tension came up several times throughout the roundtable: technology is accelerating rapidly, but human judgment, communication, and contextual understanding remain central.
The most practical example came from a startup struggling with churn Toward the end of the session, Alfia shared a story that tied many of the discussion points together.
She described mentoring a startup with an AI product that was selling extremely well — but customer churn was increasing just as quickly.
The issue wasn’t marketing.
The problem was customer success.
Teams responsible for supporting customers needed to rapidly understand prompt engineering, AI workflows, and how customers were actually using the platform. Without fast learning systems in place, the business struggled to support its own growth operationally.
That example captured something important about modern workplace learning:
In fast-moving environments, learning speed increasingly affects business speed.
Not eventually.
Blended learning is probably not going away One question that surfaced repeatedly throughout the discussion was whether e-learning might eventually replace traditional training altogether.
None of the panelists seemed to believe that.
Instead, the conversation consistently moved toward blended approaches:
Mark summarized this particularly well:
eLearning doesn’t replace certain things. We know that. But it certainly does a great job at making lots of training more efficient, more accessible.
That feels like a much more realistic framing of workplace learning being increasingly integrated into everyday work itself.
Final thoughts The most valuable part of the roundtable wasn’t any single prediction about the future of e-learning.
It was the broader operational shift underneath the conversation.
Learning is becoming less isolated from the business itself.
It’s increasingly tied to:
onboarding speed, product adoption, operational consistency, customer success, workforce adaptability, and how quickly organizations respond to change. And as technologies continue evolving faster, companies may increasingly compete on something much simpler than “training programs”: How quickly their people can learn.
Watch the full session Roundtable: Evaluating eLearning’s Role in Business Growth
Join us for iSpring Days ANZ & APAC on June 9-10
6 min
6 min
11 min
